Schools / Delhi

Road-environment audit · SSI v0.3

The road outsideSona Modern Public School - Best CBSE School in Khanpur, Delhi

A-3/4, Devli Rd, Khanpur Village, Khanpur, New Delhi, Delhi 110080, India28.51262, 77.23291audited 2026-08-06

12/100

Critically unsafeprovisional band

Critically unsafe. Almost nothing on this road protects a child from traffic on the way to the gate.

Of the five things we check, 3 are missing entirely.

This road · 12

0 · no protectioncomplete protection · 100

Checked twice, independently

Two AI readers on separate accounts · corrections logged in public

Confirmed

Corrected

Unresolved

See how each was judged

Of 153 roads scored so far, this one ranks 82 (worst first). The others scored between 0 and 41.

8.75points earned

72.25points we could see (72%)

12.1%provision

1exposure — local

12.1provision × exposure

→

12SSI · rounded to nearest · v0.3

Only what the imagery could actually resolve is scored (72% of the rubric here); the rest is left uncounted rather than guessed. A road with full protective infrastructure scores near 100.

The road in context · derived from public data

Where this road sits

Before the checks: what kind of road this is, how it meets other roads, and what passes it. These lines describe the road and its surroundings — they do not change the score.

Road layout around the gate, drawn from OpenStreetMap — Road layout · drawn from OpenStreetMap · blue dot = school coordinate

Satellite view of the same area — Satellite · © Google · retrieved 2026-08-13 (capture date not published by the imagery API)

FrontageThe gate opens onto a local street, on its N side

Junctionthe gate area sits at a 4-leg junction

Street activityno bus stop or shops mapped within 150 m (OpenStreetMap)

Crash recordcrash-location data is not yet available for Delhi — this line will be added when a public source lands

Exposure contextModerate — 22/100 (partial: no crash component yet). Describes how much traffic and crash risk passes this road — context only, never part of the road score (method: exposure v1, Data page)

Road layout data © OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL), retrieved 13 Aug 2026 · crash data: Jaipur Police · derivations: `exposure_v1` on the Data page.

What we found · five checks · IRC:SP:32-2023

Five things we checked — and the photo behind each

Each check was read once, then verified blind by a second reader on a separate account. The photo each finding came from sits right beside it. Tap “see how this was judged” for the full reasoning.

Slowing traffic downP1 · Physical speed control

Nothing slows traffic at the gate

No speed hump, table or rumble strip on the approach — vehicles reach the gate at full speed.

Absent

Also cited for this check

0 of 30 points

LevelNone (L0)

Points0 of 30

ConfidenceHigh

Coverage seen≈70%

VerificationConfirmed — both readers agreed

The full reasoning

No physical speed-control device of any kind on the frontage carriageway. Road surface is plain bitumen at the gate and for the stretches visible either side in both epochs - no hump, table, raised crossing, rumble strip or transverse bar marking anywhere in view (WtVdH5yx1uj9_h235_f90_road.jpg and WtVdH5yx1uj9_h055_f90_road.jpg, 2026-04, looking SW and NE from 13.9 m; qIfky-VVfLs3_h357_f90_trav.jpg, 2026-04, looking north toward the gate from 32.8 m; KMO3cKgedxgI_h055_f90_road.jpg, 2022-04). Surface is clearly readable roughly 35 m either side of the gate in two epochs, so absence is observed rather than assumed over that stretch; the outer zone (144 m west lanes, 164 m NE) lies on different streets and long-range surface detail is not resolvable, hence observability below 1.0.

Getting across the roadP2 · Safe crossing

No safe place to cross

No marked or raised pedestrian crossing at or near the gate.

Absent

Also cited for this check

0 of 25 points

LevelNone (L0)

Points0 of 25

ConfidenceHigh

Coverage seen≈75%

VerificationConfirmed — both readers agreed

The full reasoning

No marked pedestrian crossing anywhere in the zone. The carriageway directly outside the gate is unmarked in both epochs - no zebra, no stop line, no faded remnant visible (KMO3cKgedxgI_h116_f35_gate_zoom.jpg 2022-04; WtVdH5yx1uj9_h144_f90_gate_wide.jpg 2026-04). Approach views along the road show continuous unmarked bitumen with no crossing lines (WtVdH5yx1uj9_h235_f90_road.jpg, qIfky-VVfLs3_h177_f90_trav.jpg). Pedestrians are seen crossing the running carriageway at undefined points. Refuge question does not arise at L0.

◑

Walking without stepping into trafficP3 · Footpath & separation

A broken walking edge

A walking edge exists but is broken or blocked for most of the frontage.

Partial

Also cited for this check

6.25 of 25 points

LevelMinimal (L1)

Points6.25 of 25

ConfidenceMed

Coverage seen≈70%

VerificationConfirmed — both readers agreed

The full reasoning

Assessed as continuous clear walkable edge per mapped class 'local'. A walkable edge exists in places but is broken by permanent causes along most of the frontage. On the school side the gate fronts onto a flat undelineated paved apron at carriageway level with no kerb, no raised footpath and no separation, running straight into the running surface (KMO3cKgedxgI_h116_f90_gate_wide.jpg; WtVdH5yx1uj9_h144_f90_gate_wide.jpg). North and south of the gate the east edge is shop frontage abutting the carriageway with step and level changes rather than a through footpath (IBUeCyLFp8pF_h004_f90_trav.jpg). On the west side a kerbed paved strip fronts the Vishal Mega Mart block and the clinic block, but it is a series of shop forecourts interrupted by building projections, ramps and level changes rather than a continuous route (qIfky-VVfLs3_h357_f90_trav.jpg; FRKci3pewAuH_h247_f90_trav.jpg). Pedestrians are repeatedly seen walking in the carriageway. Not raised to L2 as no continuous usable edge is demonstrated on either side; not dropped to L0 as a paved walkable edge does physically exist along stretches. MED because the school-side edge is substantially occluded by stalls and vehicles in the 2026 views and the clearest unobstructed edge views are 2022.

Being seen and expectedP4 · Signage & zone identity

No school-zone signs

Drivers get no warning that a school gate is here.

Absent

Also cited for this check

0 of 10 points

LevelNone (L0)

Points0 of 10

ConfidenceMed

Coverage seen≈60%

VerificationConfirmed — both readers agreed

The full reasoning

No school warning sign confirmed on either approach and no compliant speed sign or carriageway speed stamp seen. Boards at the gate are school-erected (name board, admission notices, a blue board above the gate line and small red-and-white 'SCHOOL GATE' notices in WtVdH5yx1uj9_h144_f35_gate_zoom.jpg) rather than road-authority traffic signs. Pole-mounted circular and rectangular signs are present on the frontage in both epochs (WtVdH5yx1uj9_h235_f90_road.jpg, KMO3cKgedxgI_h235_f90_road.jpg, and a red-bordered circular sign at the left edge of qIfky-VVfLs3_h357_f90_trav.jpg) but none is legible at available resolution, so no value, face or symbol can be recorded. No 2023-identity asset seen: no transition or zone-start sign, no fluorescent yellow-green faces, no red-white school-zone carriageway markings, no beacon hardware. Observability held at 0.5 because unreadable signs exist that could carry a school warning; unseen is not treated as absent.

◑

The gate itselfP5 · Gate environment

A small setback at the gate

A little setback or partial barrier — limited space off the road.

Partial

Also cited for this check

2.5 of 10 points

LevelMinimal (L1)

Points2.5 of 10

ConfidenceMed

Coverage seen≈90%

VerificationConfirmed — both readers agreed

The full reasoning

Minimal setback, no barrier. The gate gives onto a shallow flat paved apron that is at carriageway level and undelineated - no kerb, no bollard line, no railing between the gate line and the running surface, and vehicles stand on it (KMO3cKgedxgI_h116_f35_gate_zoom.jpg and KMO3cKgedxgI_h116_f90_gate_wide.jpg, 2022-04; WtVdH5yx1uj9_h144_f90_gate_wide.jpg and WtVdH5yx1uj9_h144_f35_gate_zoom.jpg, 2026-04). Not L0 because a few metres of forecourt separate the gate line from the running lanes; not L2 because the apron is undefined built form continuous with the carriageway rather than protected assembly space. The gate assembly may include a narrower separate leaf on its left in the 2022 zoom, but L3 is unavailable without L2 and could not be resolved to HIGH confidence. No marked pick-up/drop-off bay anywhere in view.

At the gate

On the frontage road

Along the street

Some captures sit on neighbouring lanes; older ones are shown greyed and were used only for context.

What must be fixed · 5 actions

What would make this road safe — and who owns each fix

Each action maps to a failing check, the relevant IRC:SP:32-2023 clause, and the responsible agency. Agency labels are provisional and correctable through the dispute channel.

01Lifts P1

Install a speed table or twin speed humps within 30 m of the gate

IRC:SP:32-2023 §5.13 · Table 5.1MCD / PWD · provisional

Speed humps near schools roughly halve child-pedestrian injury odds (Tester 2004); 30 km/h calmed zones ≈ 40% fewer casualties (Grundy 2009).

02Lifts P2

Mark a crossing within 20 m of the gate — table-top preferred

IRC:SP:32-2023 §5.4.3MCD / PWD · provisional

Raised crossings cut vehicle speeds at the exact conflict point.

03Lifts P3

Provide a continuous clear walking edge on the school side

IRC:SP:32-2023 §5.4.1MCD / PWD · provisional

A continuous footpath keeps children off the carriageway on the approach, not only at the gate.

04Lifts P4

School-zone warning signs on both approaches with the speed limit

IRC:SP:32-2023 §5.8MCD / PWD · provisional

The zone must announce itself to drivers before the gate.

05Lifts P5

Add space and a marked pick-up bay off the carriageway at the gate

IRC:SP:32-2023 §5.2MCD / PWD · provisional

Children should not step from the gate into a moving traffic lane.

Responsible-agency labels come from the CFI field instrument’s mapping and are correctable via the dispute channel.

Re-audit timeline

2026-08-06Audited

2027-02-06Re-audit due

Every published road is re-read every six months, or as soon as new Street View imagery lands, or on a sustained dispute.

Something wrong on this page?

The entrance, the imagery, a finding — if any of it is wrong, tell us. A dispute pauses this page while the audit is re-verified, and the correction is logged in the public record.

Dispute this audit