Nothing slows traffic at the gate
No speed hump, table or rumble strip on the approach — vehicles reach the gate at full speed.
An independent second reader changed this — the two readings disagreed, and the evidence below settled it.
Blind read fell. The sole basis for the blind L1 was a reddish/striped transverse band at the crossing in blAhic8VSo_6_h298 (2024-11). Re-examining that image adversarially, the affirmative feature is a white zebra pedestrian crossing; the reddish band reads as the crossing's own coloured surface/approach, not a distinct rumble/TBM speed-control device, and the view is hazy. No physical hump or raised table appears there or in any other view (both gate approaches x2 panos, frHAstdCnyjL, -7cVQI). With no speed-control device affirmatively identifiable and the coloured marking properly attributed to the crossing (scored once under P2), the audit's L0 is upheld. Observability gap (blind 0.6 vs audit 0.8) settled at 0.7: the disputed band accounted for the blind's caution; device-absence is well covered near the gate but far/dirt-lot stretches are not road.