School Safety Index
DELHI · JAIPUR · PUNE
Schools / Jaipur
Only what the imagery could actually resolve is scored (68% of the rubric here); the rest is left uncounted rather than guessed. A road with full protective infrastructure scores near 100.
Before the checks: what kind of road this is, how it meets other roads, and what passes it. These lines describe the road and its surroundings — they do not change the score.
© GoogleRoad layout data © OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL), retrieved 13 Aug 2026 · crash data: Jaipur Police · derivations: `exposure_v1` on the Data page.
Each check was read once, then verified blind by a second reader on a separate account. The photo each finding came from sits right beside it. Tap “see how this was judged” for the full reasoning.
No speed hump, table or rumble strip on the approach — vehicles reach the gate at full speed.
No speed hump, table, rumble strip or raised crossing on any approach or at the gate; carriageway is plain compacted dirt throughout.
No marked or raised pedestrian crossing at or near the gate.
No marked crossing, stop line, table or refuge anywhere; gate frontage is bare dirt so no markings possible; single undivided lane.
No usable walking edge; children walk in the traffic lane.
An independent second reader changed this — the two readings disagreed, and the evidence below settled it.
Split: audit L0, my blind L1. Deciding images -XhJYg1Rv_NI_h266/_h086, KzeAaJVw5EQf_h271/_h091, x2O8Vd1WmWQn_h202/_h022, mOFbmaLOQvjI_h068/_h248. On re-examination the carriageway and its margins are a single undifferentiated dirt/sand surface with no curb, level change or paved strip demarcating a walking edge; the only raised surfaces are discontinuous private entry plinths at individual thresholds, which do not connect into a through path. Under 'permanent built condition only + positive evidence', there is no walkable edge that 'exists but is broken', so L0 is the better fit. My blind read fell — it over-credited informal margins/plinths as an edge. Well and repeatedly seen, so HIGH.
Drivers get no warning that a school gate is here.
Only the school's own name/achievement board and a 'SADHANA' advertising banner present (identity, not traffic signage). No school-warning sign, speed sign/stamp, zone-start or 2023-identity asset seen on any approach.
Children step from the gate straight toward moving traffic.
An independent second reader changed this — the two readings disagreed, and the evidence below settled it.
Split: audit L0, my blind L1. Only the two -XhJYg1Rv_NI gate frames view the entrance, and in both the actual gate leaf/wall-base is occluded by a utility pole and a parked car/van; no setback, railing, pedestrian opening or drop-off bay is positively visible. L1 requires positive evidence of a minimal setback/partial barrier; my blind L1 inferred a setback from an undifferentiated dirt expanse and a receding lane, which is inference not positive evidence, so it falls to the L0 floor. The two reads' observability differ by ~0.15; that gap is entirely the immediate gate-opening/wall-base segment hidden by the pole and parked van. Gate genuinely not in frame, so LOW.
Each action maps to a failing check, the relevant IRC:SP:32-2023 clause, and the responsible agency. Agency labels are provisional and correctable through the dispute channel.
Speed humps near schools roughly halve child-pedestrian injury odds (Tester 2004); 30 km/h calmed zones ≈ 40% fewer casualties (Grundy 2009).
Raised crossings cut vehicle speeds at the exact conflict point.
A continuous footpath keeps children off the carriageway on the approach, not only at the gate.
The zone must announce itself to drivers before the gate.
Children should not step from the gate into a moving traffic lane.
Responsible-agency labels come from the CFI field instrument’s mapping and are correctable via the dispute channel.
Every published road is re-read every six months, or as soon as new Street View imagery lands, or on a sustained dispute.
The entrance, the imagery, a finding — if any of it is wrong, tell us. A dispute pauses this page while the audit is re-verified, and the correction is logged in the public record.
Dispute this audit