The road outsideRockford Convent Sr Sec School

The only level disagreement, and my own blind read falls. Decided on 7JK82nwghP-y_h297_f90_trav.jpg and onfMei6Jb0P7_h155_f90_gate_wide.jpg, re-examined. In the first, a raised concrete margin runs along the base of the school compound wall north-west of the gate; on re-examination it is wider than my blind read allowed - roughly 0.6-1.0 m rather than 0.3-0.6 m - it sits at kerb height, and four uniformed children are walking along it in single file while a fifth walks on the carriageway beside them. That is a built raised walking edge in actual use, not merely a wall plinth, and my blind read dismissed it wrongly. In the second, that margin is absent across the gate frontage itself, where the school-side apron is bare earth continuous with the carriageway at grade; GxuyZmyGQbIh_h120_f90_road.jpg shows the margin resuming south-east of the gate with a power pole planted in it. Provision therefore exists on the school side but is interrupted at the gate and obstructed by a pole - permanent causes - which is exactly L1, 'exists but broken/blocked along most of frontage', and short of L2, which would require a continuous usable edge on one side. The audit reached the right level on partly unsound reasoning, which is corrected here: it credited private shopfront plinths and entrance steps on the opposite side as walking edges when those are building thresholds at differing levels, and it cited UOdEDX75Gg9f_h098 (45 m away on a back lane) and Ac3z6Yg2TVbP_h085 (149 m away on a different commercial street) as frontage evidence. The real support for L1 is the school-side margin, which the audit note does not identify. Confidence MED, not HIGH: the margin's width, height and continuity are read from a single oblique view at moderate resolution and its extent south-east of the gate is partly inferred. Observability settled at 0.75 against 0.7 audit and 0.85 blind; the gap is accounted for by two segments - the frontage road edge beyond roughly 80 m north-west and south-east, which no panorama on this street images (the far panoramas sit on adjacent lanes), and the ground plane immediately at the gate, where parked two-wheelers occlude the surface in both wide views, though a built level change would still read behind them.

One school warning sign: a pole-mounted blue backing plate carrying a red-bordered triangular warning symbol over a legend plate reading 'School Ahead', on the north-east side of the street about 29 m north-west of the gate, facing traffic approaching from the north-west. Standard blue/white/red faces, not fluorescent yellow-green. No equivalent sign found facing the south-east approach in any view down that side, so L2 is not met. No speed-limit sign and no carriageway speed stamp anywhere, so no speed value to record. No 2023-identity asset: no transition or zone-start sign, no red-white school-zone carriageway markings, no beacon hardware. The boards on the compound wall are school notice and information boards, not traffic signs. Confidence MED - the sign is read from a single view; sign faces turned away from the camera and the outer parts of the zone cannot be assessed, hence the reduced observability.