Road-environment audit · SSI v0.3

The road outsideLexicon Kids School in Viman Nagar, Pune

Ground & First Floor, Shalimar Triumph, 72, Viman Nagar Rd, opposite Khalsa Dairy, Clover Park, Viman Nagar, Pune, Maharashtra 411014, India18.56515, 73.91463audited 2026-09-04

41/100

Some protectionprovisional band

Some protection. A few protections exist here, but serious gaps remain.

Of the five things we check, 2 are missing entirely.

This road · 41

0 · no protectioncomplete protection · 100

Checked twice, independently

Two AI readers on separate accounts · corrections logged in public

Confirmed

Corrected

Unresolved

See how each was judged

Of 153 roads scored so far, this one ranks 153 (worst first). The others scored between 0 and 36.

30points earned

61.75points we could see (62%)

48.6%provision

0.85exposure — collector

41.3provision × exposure

→

41SSI · rounded to nearest · v0.3

Only what the imagery could actually resolve is scored (62% of the rubric here); the rest is left uncounted rather than guessed. A road with full protective infrastructure scores near 100.

The road in context · derived from public data

Where this road sits

Before the checks: what kind of road this is, how it meets other roads, and what passes it. These lines describe the road and its surroundings — they do not change the score.

Road layout around the gate, drawn from OpenStreetMap — Road layout · drawn from OpenStreetMap · blue dot = school coordinate

FrontageThe gate opens onto a collector road (Viman Nagar Road), on its S side

Junctionthe gate area sits at a 7-leg junction

Street activityno bus stop or shops mapped within 150 m (OpenStreetMap)

Crash recordcrash-location data is not yet available for Delhi — this line will be added when a public source lands

Exposure contextModerate — 37/100 (partial: no crash component yet). Describes how much traffic and crash risk passes this road — context only, never part of the road score (method: exposure v1, Data page)

Road layout data © OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL), retrieved 13 Aug 2026 · crash data: Jaipur Police · derivations: `exposure_v1` on the Data page.

What we found · five checks · IRC:SP:32-2023

Five things we checked — and the photo behind each

Each check was read once, then verified blind by a second reader on a separate account. The photo each finding came from sits right beside it. Tap “see how this was judged” for the full reasoning.

Slowing traffic downP1 · Physical speed control

Nothing slows traffic at the gate

No speed hump, table or rumble strip on the approach — vehicles reach the gate at full speed.

Absent

Also cited for this check

0 of 30 points

LevelNone (L0)

Points0 of 30

ConfidenceMed

Coverage seen≈55%

VerificationConfirmed — both readers agreed

The full reasoning

No speed hump, table, rumble strip or other physical speed-control device visible on the frontage carriageway in either approach direction (bZhCDZyf7Py0_h133/h313) or along the traverse. Road surface reads flat and continuous near the gate. Approaches visible so absence is assessable, but frontage covered by a single recent pano.

◑

Getting across the roadP2 · Safe crossing

A marked crossing in the zone

A legible marked crossing is present in the school zone.

Partial

Also cited for this check

12.5 of 25 points

LevelBasic (L2)

Points12.5 of 25

ConfidenceMed

Coverage seen≈55%

VerificationConfirmed — both readers agreed

The full reasoning

No marked pedestrian crossing visible at or within 20 m of the gate on the school frontage (bZhCDZyf7Py0_h217). A legible zebra crossing is present at the signalised junction within the zone but far from the gate (KYJxT9BzhqwZ_h270). L2 for a legible marked crossing in zone; does not reach L3 (not within 20 m of gate, single view / MED confidence).

◑

Walking without stepping into trafficP3 · Footpath & separation

A footpath on one side

A continuous, usable walking edge runs along one side.

Partial⟳ Corrected in review

BasicBasic

An independent second reader changed this — the two readings disagreed, and the evidence below settled it.

Also cited for this check

12.5 of 25 points

LevelBasic (L2)

Points12.5 of 25

ConfidenceMed

Coverage seen≈70%

VerificationCorrected in the second reading

The full reasoning

The blind read's L3 falls. The school-frontage side has a clearly continuous, usable paved footpath with a metal roadside guard railing (bZhCDZyf7Py0_h217/h133/h313) — L2 is solid. L3 for a collector requires continuous usable raised footpath on BOTH sides at HIGH confidence. The blind cited CAoSHENJQUJJ_h050 as the 'opposite' frontage, but that pano is on the same/adjacent shop side (the laptop-retail row that continues past Anek's/Lexicon), not a clean opposite-carriageway view; the true opposite side is only glimpsed with parking occlusion. Both-sides continuity therefore cannot be confirmed at HIGH, so the L3 qualifying attribute fails its confidence bar and the level defaults to the lower candidate. Parked two-wheelers/standees/AC units treated as movable and ignored. Final L2, MED.

Being seen and expectedP4 · Signage & zone identity

No school-zone signs

Drivers get no warning that a school gate is here.

Absent

Also cited for this check

0 of 10 points

LevelNone (L0)

Points0 of 10

ConfidenceMed

Coverage seen≈60%

VerificationConfirmed — both readers agreed

The full reasoning

No school-zone warning sign, no speed-limit sign or carriageway speed stamp, and no 2023-identity zone assets (transition sign, zone-start marking, fluorescent yellow-green faces, red-white school-zone markings, beacon hardware) visible at the gate, on either approach, or along the traverse. Visible signage is commercial shop boards only.

◑

The gate itselfP5 · Gate environment

Space and a railing at the gate

A clear setback or railing gives room to gather off the carriageway.

Partial

5 of 10 points

LevelBasic (L2)

Points5 of 10

ConfidenceMed

Coverage seen≈80%

VerificationConfirmed — both readers agreed

The full reasoning

Gate does not open directly onto the carriageway: entrance is set back behind a paved footpath and a continuous metal roadside guard railing giving off-carriageway assembly space (gate_zoom/gate_wide bZhCDZyf7Py0_h217). No clearly distinct separate pedestrian opening confirmable in zoom and rail continuity to first crossing not verifiable, so L3 not awarded. No marked pick-up/drop-off bay.

At the gate

On the frontage road

Along the street

Some captures sit on neighbouring lanes; older ones are shown greyed and were used only for context.

What must be fixed · 5 actions

What would make this road safe — and who owns each fix

Each action maps to a failing check, the relevant IRC:SP:32-2023 clause, and the responsible agency. Agency labels are provisional and correctable through the dispute channel.

01Lifts P1

Install a speed table or twin speed humps within 30 m of the gate

IRC:SP:32-2023 §5.13 · Table 5.1MCD / PWD · provisional

Speed humps near schools roughly halve child-pedestrian injury odds (Tester 2004); 30 km/h calmed zones ≈ 40% fewer casualties (Grundy 2009).

02Lifts P2

Mark a crossing within 20 m of the gate — table-top preferred

IRC:SP:32-2023 §5.4.3MCD / PWD · provisional

Raised crossings cut vehicle speeds at the exact conflict point.

03Lifts P3

Provide a continuous clear walking edge on the school side

IRC:SP:32-2023 §5.4.1MCD / PWD · provisional

A continuous footpath keeps children off the carriageway on the approach, not only at the gate.

04Lifts P4

School-zone warning signs on both approaches with the speed limit

IRC:SP:32-2023 §5.8MCD / PWD · provisional

The zone must announce itself to drivers before the gate.

05Lifts P5

Add space and a marked pick-up bay off the carriageway at the gate

IRC:SP:32-2023 §5.2MCD / PWD · provisional

Children should not step from the gate into a moving traffic lane.

Responsible-agency labels come from the CFI field instrument’s mapping and are correctable via the dispute channel.

Re-audit timeline

2026-09-04Audited

2027-03-07Re-audit due

Every published road is re-read every six months, or as soon as new Street View imagery lands, or on a sustained dispute.

Something wrong on this page?

The entrance, the imagery, a finding — if any of it is wrong, tell us. A dispute pauses this page while the audit is re-verified, and the correction is logged in the public record.

Dispute this audit